During the eighteenth century "vues d'optique"
or "perspective views" became extremely popular in
England and Europe. Like other optical prints they
capitalized on a connoisseur market eager for the latest
novelty. English publishers such as John Bowles and
Robert Sayer had great success with these optical views,
which quickly developed into a collecting craze that
swept through print shops on both sides of the Channel.
"Vues d'optiques" were specifically designed to create
the illusion of perspective when viewed with a zograscope
or perspective glass. These viewing devices used a series
of reflecting mirrors to enhance the illusion of depth in
the print, creating a veritable "view" for the onlooker.
Typically these prints depicted city or landscape views,
and were horizontal in format. They had roughly the same
dimensions and were sold with heavy opaque colouring, so
as to show the tints when viewed through the lens. In
their heyday, optical prints were a technical revolution;
they could be seen in almost every fashionable drawing
room, and were enjoyed by the poorer classes in print
shops or at traveling fairs. For a small fee the citizens
of Europe and England could travel the world without
leaving their village. The "vue d'optique" was the first
medium to bring the visible appearance of the wider world
to a large European public. Ironically the artists and
engravers who created these prints rarely had first hand
knowledge of the scenes depicted, hence the views were
often not as accurate as they were advertised to be. As a
result of their constant handling optical prints such as
these are rare, especially in good condition. They are
not only beautiful images but a fascinating glimpse into
the history of printmaking.
TO explain further :-
Little has heen published (particularly in English) on
the type of print known as the perspective view, intended
for use in an optical diagonal machine. Nevertheless
these prints were highly popular in the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries, and still appear regularly on the
art market. lt therefore seems worth collecting what
information is known and adding what I have heen able to
discover.
The optical diagonal machine is a viewing apparatus
whose main components are a large, double convex lens and
a mirror fixed directly behind it at an angle. These are
attached either on top of a pyramid shaped box or on top
of a stand. When the spectator looks at perspective views
through the lens of the viewing machine, an illusion of
recession is produced. In principe, a similar illusion of
distance can he achieved simply by using a single,
detached convex lens which is larger than the distance
between two human eyes (at least ten centimetres). When
this lens is held just in front of the eyes, the
spectator is looking at the perspective view through its
two edges which function like two prisms. Light rays
bouncing off the print are refracted in such a way that
they enter the eyes in a parallel direction. The brain
interprets the incoming parallel images as a single image
seen from a great distance. The important function of the
lens in the optical machine is not its magnification but
its creation of an illusion of depth in binocular
vision.
So that the greatest illusion of recession can be
achieved, the perspective view should be designed
according to strict principles of linear perspective,
with a distant object placed in the centre of the print.
For example, a view looking down a receding street works
well because all horizontal lines in the buildings appear
as lines converging at the same vanishing point. The
interior of a large building, such as a cathedral, is
also suitable for creating a successful illusion of depth
(fig. 37). The least effective point of view is
perpendicular to a facade, such as a row of houses, or to
the front of a palace, because from that viewpoint there
is no effect of perspective. In any case, the angle of
vision for any perspective view should be wider than the
angle of forty-six degrees which corresponds to the human
eye's normal range of vision. This explains why
perspective views have an appearance similar to a
photograph taken with a wide-angle lens. Of course
perspective views are not the only images which can be
used with the optical machine: any two-dimensional image,
such as a painting or a mural, would be suitable.
However, the illusion of recession the latter would give
to the spectator, would depend on the emphasis on linear
perspective their images had.
Some views, but not all, were also executed in mirror
image so that they would be seen in the right direction
through the viewing apparatus (see fig- 38, for example).
This of course is simple for the engraver who does not
have to worry about problems of reversal when engraving
the plate.
Perspective views were produced from the early
eighteenth century to the beginning of the nineteenth,
the greatest number of them probably between c. 1740-1790
. Firstly, they are usually etched and invariably
designed to be seen through a viewing machine, with
consequent reversals of text and image. The size of the
image is about 23 by 40 centimetres and the entire plate,
with text, about 30 by 45 centimetres: sizes vary by 5 to
10 centimetres at the most. Perspective views are always
horizontal in format, since the subject-matter is usually
topographical. They often show monumental buildings
(palaces, churches or town halls) or characteristic parts
of towns (gates, squares, streets or harbours for
example). More rarely they show portraits, depict
moralistic or biblical themes, or historical events such
as the demolition of the Bastille or the ascent of
hot-air balloons, to name two of the more popular.
The etcher would usually work after existing prints,
less often after specially-prepared drawings and more
rarely still after paintings; the plates were probably
etched in the workshops of the publisher. lt is likely
that the publisher controlled the whole operation,
although there is no evidenee that the printing and
hand-colouring were done in the same workshop. All these
perspective views have a strong common factor in the
nature of their execution. The etcher paid special
attention to the straight lines in architecture, and
accentuated horizontal lines in buildings to enhance the
perspective. At the same time he paid little attention to
surface detail or texture, or to the contrast between
light and shade. lt is often impossible in these prints
to determine the material of which a building has been
constructed - brick, stone or stucco, for example -
although to some extent this difficulty is overcome by
the use of hand-colouring. The care taken in this,
however, was only noticeable in views produced in London.
In general one can say that the quality of colouring in
perspective views is superior to that found on popular
woodcuts of the time, although nowhere near the standard
reached in prints designed as works of art. Perspective
views served a different purpose from artistic prints.
from http://www.xs4all.nl/~kalden/auth/perspectiveviews.htm